Removing judement thread?

[Nixer]

Ha Ha, wouldnt that be great!

Thats what I thought I would have to do, I will try again!

thank you.

[Nixer]

I did send another letter to the court. This time I said: I recently sent the attached letter and did recieve a response from you, but i think my letter may have been a little confusing and would like to ask again. Can you tell me how you verify information with credit reporting agencies?

They responded yet again handwritten on the letter I sent them with:

Credit agencies come in to our office and review files and/or review cases on line. We do not send them info to them.

They call re: specific file numbers to verify information like checking if the judgement was satisfied.

Then stamp on the bottom REC'D April 14 2009.

(At least this time they used my SASE)

So for one of my judgments sounds like this is not going to help me out. Unless the CRA says the courthouse sent them the info correct?

Is this even going to stand up for anything since its handwritten?

Any thoughts?

thanks

[Trish]

Sorry if I've asked this before........but is there ANYTHING reporting incorrectly on this judgment?

[Nixer]

The only thing which I am not sure about is that the judgment says i owe $567. The bill and the atty say $507.67. I think the other 60 is court fees, but no one has asked for that. Otherwise no everthing appears to be reporting correctly.

[Trish]

And the letter you sent the first time disputing it is the letter from the judgment thread right? If so.....you should send a PR letter to the CRAs.

I don't think we have a PR letter sample.........so if you need one let me know and I will find a good one to post.

[Nixer]

First I disputed multiple inaccuracies I think. They came back verified.

I think the 2nd letter in the removing judgements thread is a PR letter. I used a version of that. At that time I also sent letters to the courthouses just in case the CRA came back and said they verified with the courthouse, hoping the courthouse would give the response that they dont verify with CRA's.

So far I think I have followed the instructions in the thread.

[Trish]

Hmmm......I'm just wondering about the 1st letter.
If by disputing specific inaccuracies in the judgment made it look like you were saying it was yours........but it just wasn't correct. kwim?

Obviously the courts aren't going to be any help for you so I think the best thing to do would be to redispute again with the first letter......which is basically saying it's not yours......without saying "not mine".

[Nixer]

Sounds good.

I will have to find the letter I sent at first to make sure I disputed multiple inaccuracies, not positive on that.

Thanks Trish!

[Trish]

Well....I wish I could have been more help. Sorry the courts are being such a PITA.

[johnson]

I'm glad to see I'm not the only one the Court Houses sent these bizarre replies to, when asking about CRA interaction. I think the correct label for the Court House employee who responded isn't "moron" as mentioned earlier in these postings....but rather "lazy moron"...since they choose to hand write the darn response on the bottom of the original letter...even when I specifically asked for a typed reply on Court House letterhead. Give me a break! :rolleyes:

I'm going down personally next week to (hopefully) get a typed letter from them stating their procedure for CRAs. Actually, I'm bringing my own typed letter and asking them, if the wording's correct, to use it for their response on their letterhead. Heck, I'll PAY them a research fee if they like, and send flowers afterward to the clerk who works with me on this. I'm beginning to realize I should reward anyone there who's capable of helping me in a sane, coherent manner. :D

Sorry for the vent. It's just crazy the hoops we must jump through sometimes.