I'm not saying it isn't done, it seems to be done all the time, but therein lies the problem. If it is being done then a certain collusion is being perpetrated against the debtor by the purchaser and the courts
Even if the purchasing plaintiff provides an affidavit of the debt and balance purchased, it should be considered "hearsay" as no one at the purchaser has personal knowledge of the creation, maintenance, issuance and tracking of the statements and debt, due to the fact that they are business records of the originating creditor not the purchasing plaintiff.
So the above scenario could be considered a violation of 18 USC 1341 & 1962 requiring complicity of State court judges who in their actions may violate 18 USC 371
This is also happening in the Mortgage industry where there is NO original note in possession. So they file a "lost note affidavit" and things proceed along "wink wink Nod Nod, say no more" and the unwitting consumer doesn't even know he's been screwed again. Because it is his right to see the original note he signed at closing, and if the banksters cannot produce it then they cannot pursue their claim without the collusion of the court. There was a decision in Florida I believe in 04 or 06 in this, holding for the consumer.
 |